Brother,I may catch a lot of flak for this but we MAY have to hold our noses and vote for this putz. Do we REALLY want four more years of Lord Barry? Can we afford four more years of him appointing morons like Sotomayor and Kagan to the SCOTUS? Allowing him to keep scumbags like Holdren and Sunstein in as Czars? Watching that moron sell out the military, give missile secrets to Russia, and bow to anyone and everyone? Mission Goal #1: BOOT OBAMA OUT!Then we can start focusing on yanking Mittens to the right, along with Congress and the Senate. But first things first, GET RID OF BARRY!
Damn, meant to add that I am hoping that Romney picks a solid Conservative as his running mate, i.e., Santorum, Perry, etc.
Gunny,I'm going to vote for Willard, if he gets the nomination. But I think he is left of John McCain, which means we'll have four more years of BS wishy washy crap, enabling the Dems to rally and win in 2016. I want a barn burning conservative in that office. It is my humble opinion that a true conservative will fix a lot of stuff that is wrong with America, fiscally, and faithfully. But a flip-flopper like Romney will just languish.
SANTORUM: "We have laws in states, like the one at the Supreme Court right now, that [have] sodomy laws and they were there for a purpose. Because, again, I would argue, they undermine the basic tenets of our society and the family. And if the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. Does that undermine the fabric of our society? I would argue yes, it does. It all comes from, I would argue, this right to privacy that doesn't exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution, this right that was created, it was created in Griswold - Griswold was the contraceptive case - and abortion. And now we're just extending it out. And the further you extend it out, the more you - this freedom actually intervenes and affects the family. You say, well, it's my individual freedom. Yes, but it destroys the basic unit of our society because it condones behavior that's antithetical to strong, healthy families. Whether it's polygamy, whether it's adultery, where it's sodomy, all of those things, are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family."That's a quote from Mr. Santorum regarding what you and your wife/girlfriend or husband/boyfriend are allowed to do in private. Sodomy Laws cover any kind of "oral" sex also.Do you think he has the right to dictate your consensual sex life? He thinks he does.
I happen to agree with Santorum. If you admit in public that you engage in that behavior, you are confessing to breaking the law. I don't think the government should be peeking in windows, but I don't agree you can do whatever you want behind your closed doors. After all, you can't butcher young nurses in your kitchen, even though it's your kitchen.
I'll have to disagree.I care less what people are doing in their bedrooms (legal aged adults) because is isn't my business.The other side of the coin is that people shouldn't be advertising their sexual preferences or activities to the general public who don't want to hear about it.If you happen to be into something most people would view as vile, you should probably keep it within the confines of those with similar tastes.
Unfortunately we will need to hold our noses again if Mittens gets the nomination for the purpose of getting rid of zero and his minions. If the rest of our countrymen decide Mittens is it then we'll need to tow the line. We can do well if we also elect conservatives to congress.Regarding alphabet's comment, I don't care what what people do behind closed doors. I don't want them or the government telling me that it's a "positive alternative lifestyle" and forcing us to accept it as if it was normal.
Amen. This whole tolerance crap is ruining this country. We should NOT accept aberrations as normal, acceptable behavior.
Tenth, Let me belatedly weigh in. Santorum is right of course. When I was growing up homosexuality was illegal in all 50 States and it was considered a mental disorder. The first line of attack for liberals (progressives, democrats, socialists, whatever) was to change the definition of homosexuality - to "normalize" it. Once that happened it exploded into the open and we are now force-fed the case for "normality" around the clock and our kids are going to get it in school. Having an honest discussion about homosexuality will no doubt shortly become a hate crime. But that's not the worst part - right after homosexual "marriage" was made legal in New York recently it emboldened pedophiles everywhere and an albeit small, but nevertheless active group of doctors moved to decriminalize child rape by moving it out of the mental disorder category. They want to suppress the term pedophile in favor of "minor attracted adult." The homosexual issue is the tip of the proverbial iceberg. Liberals want the whole enchilada. Who among you is going to be happy when your six year old grandson is sodomized by some sick bastard and you are told you have to understand the needs of a "minor attracted adult?" Back when the country wasn't crazy no one was the wiser and quite frankly no one cared about two homosexuals boffing each other in private - but that's not what they want to do - they want to brand it "normal" and they want our blessing. Indeed they want a super-set of rights to protect and promote their abhorrent behavior. Believe me - they ain't done.
I have a K-Bar that is minor attracted attracted.