I know that none of this "gang" will be able to tolerate the truth tht I am going to post, so Tenth, quickly delete it before their eyes get burned with the truth.
So is it okay for a liberal Democrat to get Americans killed for oil? Granted, Libya didn't kill any of our guys, but it could have.
Very funny. This WAS a joke, wasn't it, Tenth?
So you 'believe' that this Qadafi take-down was all about oil? Are you sure that you aren't confusing this with the GW Bush preemptive War on Iraq in 2003? After all, Saddam had many more millions of barrels of oil than Qadafi.
Further, are you suggesting above that you are sad that no U.S. Military member was killed in the removal of this dictator? Did I read that right? Do you really loathe Obama so much that you are disappointed that not a single Service Member was killed? I surely must have misread your intention, didn't I Tenth?
Isn't it amazing that GW Bush, a war hero [you said this on Paladin's blog] had to declare a war to take down a dastardly dictator like Saddam while Obama used NATO air power to take down this dastardly dictator. No loss of life. No disable Vets. No hundreds of billions of dollars of Tax dollars spent?
That's what really upsets you, Tenth. The president you loathe did something that the 'war hero' could not do. And not only that, but bin Laden was killed on Obama's watch. Double the loathing.
Listen, I would be happy to 'educate' you and the other members of this gang about the OIL issue that you all high-fived here, but it would have to be in a follow-up comment.
Would you like me to educate you and the others here on the Qadafi oil issue or are you all happy to maintain your happy ignorance of this?
Let me know if I can help.
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Mud's so smart, What would we do without him?
Here you go Mud. I hope you enjoy what you just asked for.